Senate Joint Resolution 47: Promoting Early Education


Last Updated: May 27, 2010
Senate Joint Resolution 47: Promoting Early Education
Senator Hudak and Senator Shaffer B.; Representative Benefield and Representative Solano

Concerning the importance of maintaining quality services for public school kindergarten students who were enrolled in high-quality preschool programs.

HSLDA's Position:
Action Requested:
None at this time

4/27/2010     (Senate)     Introduced - Third Reading
5/11/2010     (House)     Introduced - Third Reading Passed
5/11/2010     (Senate)     Third Reading Passed
5/12/2010     (House)     Third Reading Passed
5/20/2010     Signed by the President of the Senate
5/24/2010     Signed by the Speaker of the House


According to the 2005 NAEP test scores of children from states that have low compulsory attendance ages (5-6) did not score any higher than children from the other states, and in some subjects their average was actually lower.

Many education experts have concluded that beginning a child's formal education too early may actually result in burnout and poor scholastic performance later.

Lowering the compulsory attendance age erodes the authority of parents who are in the best position to determine when their child's formal education should begin.

A report published February 6, 2007 by the Goldwater Institute examines Stanford 9 test scores and finds Arizona kindergarten programs initially improve learning but have no measurable impact on reading, math, or language arts test scores by fifth grade.

The data show that students in schools with all-day kindergarten programs have statistically significant higher 3rd-grade test scores, but there is no impact on 5th-grade scores. This finding is consistent with previous research. Forcing children into school early delivers short-term benefits at best.

-For more information on compulsory attendance, please see our memorandum on Compulsory Attendance Age Legislation.

 Other Resources

Bill Text

Bill History