From the HSLDA E-lert Service:


12/10/2012 5:18:52 PM
James Mason--HSLDA
HSLDA: Judge--Case of Seized Newborn May Now Proceed

From the HSLDA E-lert Service...

Judge--Case of Seized Newborn May Now Proceed

When Jodi Ferris arrived at Hershey Medical Center after giving birth
in an ambulance, the last thing she and her husband, Scott, expected
was to lose custody of their newborn daughter, forcing them to spend
the first night of their daughter's life sleeping in their car in the
parking lot across the street.

But that is exactly what happened after Jodi--like any concerned
mom--apparently asked hospital staff too many questions about the care
her baby daughter was receiving.

In March we told you about the civil rights case HSLDA filed against
the Pennsylvania social worker and Hershey Medical Center staff who
seized "Annie" shortly after she was born:

Several months later, in July, the social worker and the medical
defendants both asked the federal district court judge to dismiss the
lawsuit. If these motions had been granted, the case would have ended.

Now, we're pleased to report a major victory in this case. Last week
the judge denied both motions to dismiss, allowing the Ferrises' case
to proceed.

Case Recap

Scott and Jodi had planned on having a home birth, but when Jodi's
labor progressed too quickly for the midwife to arrive, they called an
ambulance. Annie was born on the way to the hospital.

At the hospital, Jodi was met with a flurry of activity. Some of it
was what you would expect after delivering a baby in an ambulance. As
any concerned mom would do, Jodi asked about the condition of her
child and the care she was receiving.

Jodi received conflicting answers, ranging from a statement that Annie
was doing fine to one that she would need stay in the hospital for
three days. This understandably caused Jodi more concern and prompted
her to ask her questions with more urgency.

Not too long after Jodi and Annie arrived, it appeared that the
medical staff had had enough of Jodi questioning what they were doing.
A government social worker, Angela Lopez-Heagy, entered Jodi's room
and announced that she was there to conduct an investigation of
allegations the nature of which she refused to divulge.

When Jodi told Lopez-Heagy that she wasn't comfortable answering
questions without knowing what the allegations were, the social worker
told her that if Jodi wasn't willing to cooperate she would call a
police officer to take custody of Annie.

The social worker grilled Jodi about why she had refused to allow the
hospital to give Annie the hepatitis B vaccine, and asked other
questions about Annie's care that HSLDA believes fall within routine
parental decision making.

From time to time, the social worker would leave the room to confer
with hospital staff. A nurse physically blocked the door to prevent
Jodi from also leaving.

Eventually the social worker told Jodi that she would need to agree to
a "safety plan." When Jodi asked to see the plan, Lopez-Heagy told her
it wasn't written down yet, but if she did not consent to the safety
plan and agree to "whatever the hospital wanted," she would lose
custody of her newborn child.

Meanwhile, Scott had left to bring the Ferrises' other children to a
friends' home. Jodi told the social worker that she was not
comfortable signing a safety plan before Scott returned.

Lopez-Heagy responded that she was not waiting any longer. If Scott
returned by the time the safety plan was prepared, she said, he could
review it. Otherwise, if Jodi didn't sign the safety plan, "I'm
calling the police and having them take custody of the baby."

That is exactly what happened. Jodi was directed by a uniformed police
officer to hand her newborn daughter over to a nurse. Although she
begged to be allowed to sign the safety plan even though Scott hadn't
returned, she was told, "That window has closed."

Jodi was then escorted off the hospital premises. On the way out she
met Scott, who was just returning from dropping off the other

Jodi was allowed to return every three hours to nurse the baby, but
she could not remain in the hospital. She and Scott slept in their car
in the parking lot across the street.

The next morning, a juvenile-court judge returned Annie to Scott and
Jodi. Two weeks later he dismissed the case against them.

Why HSLDA Took This Case

You may be asking yourself what the Ferris case has to do with

Our hard-won homeschooling freedoms depend on parental rights. HSLDA
is concerned that those rights are being eroded in many areas of our
law and culture. Anytime and anywhere that parental rights are
diminished, it ultimately affects homeschooling.

One of the scenarios our lawyers hear about over and over again is
similar to Scott and Jodi's.

A homeschooling mom takes a child to the emergency room after an
injury on the soccer field. The admitting nurse asks mom about
immunizations and asks the child probing questions about guns in the
home and whether the child feels safe with mom and dad.

The homeschool mama-bear instincts kick in and she objects.

All too often, this innocent act of simply questioning medical
personnel in a hospital results in a visit from a social worker to
"encourage cooperation."

Hospitals and doctor's offices should not be hostile environments. And
asking doctors questions about the need for various treatments is not
abuse or neglect.

Yet, there appears to be a growing trend among doctors and nurses,
especially in hospitals, to quickly summon social workers to coerce
cooperation with their questions, tests, or recommendations--not to
investigate suspected abuse or neglect.

Some of those who read this will be surprised or even offended that we
are suing doctors and nurses. We are certainly grateful for the
expertise and skill that medical personnel employ to heal us and we
are not intending to indict the entire profession.

But many reading this will identify with Scott and Jodi. I know this
because I have received dozens of emails from those folks.

One of the most important principles HSLDA is hoping to establish in
this case is that hospital staff who collaborate with government
social workers in situations like Scott and Jodi's can be held liable
for violating federal constitutional rights to the same extent as a
government agent can be.

A favorable outcome in the Ferris case would act as a deterrent to
this type of conduct by healthcare workers in the future.

The Decision

When the medical defendants at Hershey Medical Center moved to dismiss
our amended complaint, they argued that because they are not state
employees, they should not be held liable for violations of the Fourth
and Fourteenth Amendments:

In rejecting their argument, the judge held that "[t]he Amended
Complaint thus establishes that the H[ershey] M[edical] C[enter]
defendants knowingly set into motion and participated in a chain of
events intending that a constitutional violation, namely the improper
removal of [Annie] from her parents' custody, would occur." You may
read the full decision here:

The judge's decision allows HSLDA to proceed to the next phase of the
case. Now we will be able to depose all of the defendants and gain
access to their notes, records, and policies in preparation for trial.

We will also be engaging experts to testify that Annie faced no
immediate threat to her health or safety that would justify what the
defendants did here.

We Need Your Help

The homeschooling movement has grown and prospered over the past three
decades. At the same time, however, parental rights in other areas of
life are being nibbled away almost imperceptibly.

We don't want to be like the proverbial frog that doesn't feel the
water heating up until it's too late!

If we are going to stop this trend, we will need more people like
Scott and Jodi who are willing to take a stand. And we will need to
stand together with them in defense of parental rights as faithfully
as we have for homeschooling freedom.

If you are reading this and are not a member of HSLDA, won't you
consider joining today? Your membership dues will help support all the
work we do to defend and expand homeschooling freedom and parental
rights. And by becoming a member, you will be standing for freedom
with tens of thousands of other families.


If you are already a member or would like to help more, please
consider making a tax-deductible gift to the Homeschool Freedom Fund.
Your generous gift will make it possible for us to pursue this case
and others like it to establish precedents that will help protect all
of us.


HSLDA is currently considering two new complicated cases involving
homeschooled children who were seized by hospitals and a third
involving an infant. And we will also be pursuing two other cases
involving unconstitutional entry into the home, similar to the
Loudermilk case -- , which is
now on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth

Please pray that we would have wisdom and discernment and that the
cases would protect and expand liberty. We thank you for your support.

James R. Mason, III
HSLDA Director of Litigation

-> What's the shortest distance between two homeschoolers?

HSLDA's elert service! When threats to homeschool freedoms arise,
you want to be able to respond. We make it possible.

More reasons to join HSLDA...

The HSLDA E-lert Service is a service of:

Home School Legal Defense Association
P.O. Box 3000
Purcellville, Virginia 20134
Phone: (540) 338-5600
Fax: (540) 338-2733

How To Subscribe:

- Subscribe to the HSLDA E-lert Service at our website:

- Or send an email with name and complete mailing address to:

Subscription Information:

- You subscribed to the HSLDA E-lert Service as:


- To unsubscribe from the HSLDA E-lert Service send an email from
the email address you want to unsubscribe to:

- To change your email address or make other changes to your
subscription, visit the HSLDA E-lert Service account web page at:

POSTMASTERS: This message is being sent to the most recent address we
have for our subscribers. If this is an invalid email address or you
have other problems, please reply to
DISCLAIMER: This is considered a private and confidential message
from HSLDA to its bonafide HSLDA E-lert Service subscribers.
HSLDA cannot attest to the authenticity of copies posted, forwarded,
or sent by any party other than HSLDA.
NOTE: Please do not reply or otherwise use this email address; is for broadcast purposes only and is not intended to
receive incoming messages. We cannot reply to any email sent to this
address. If you have comments or questions, please send email to or call HSLDA at 540-338-5600. HSLDA members can also
email staff directly through the Members website at Thank you for your cooperation.