From the HSLDA E-lert Service:
< BACK TO ARCHIVE

Date:
From:
Subject:

9/12/2012 5:32:18 PM
Scott Woodruff--HSLDA
Virginia-- Defending the Religious Exemption

======================================================================
From the HSLDA E-lert Service...
======================================================================


Virginia-- Defending the Religious Exemption

Dear HSLDA Members and Friends:

Some media outlets have published criticism recently of Virginia's
religious exemption statute. The criticism is not valid.

The statute has been on the books for 35 years. It works well. No
change is needed. Here is a rebuttal of each point of criticism.

"Once children are exempted from public school attendance, they might
get no education at all."

It is always easy to stir up anxiety about "what ifs." But let's look
at the reality.

In 1994, Dr. Brian D. Ray analyzed the standardized test scores of
students educated under the religious exemption. He concluded: "Based
on this sample of students, Virginia's home educated students
operating under the state of Virginia's religious exemption statute
are doing quite well in terms of academic achievement. In fact, on
average, they score 33 to 40 percentile points higher than the
national average of students tested."

It's not strongly religious people the commentators should be worried
about. They should be worried about the profoundly secular public
schools which, sadly,
have turned out thousands of functionally illiterate adults.


The religious exemption law has been on the books for 35 years now.
Has something happened recently to justify sudden concern? No. If it
were causing any actual problem--as opposed to hand-wringing over
"what ifs"-- it would have shown during those 35 years.

People of strong religious faith have historically been some of the
most highly motivated to educate their children. Indeed, history will
reflect that people of religion were the leading edge of the literacy
movement precisely because it was so important for them that their
children be able to read the Bible independently. It still is.

There is no empirical reason to doubt that students under the
religious exemption are receiving a satisfactory education. The
empirical evidence available to us indicates religiously exempt
students score way ahead of others on standardized tests. Let's focus
on that reality.

"The religious exemption violates Virginia's Constitution."

A commentator has suggested that the Virginia Constitution gives a
child a right to an education and that the child's right to an
education is violated when school board exempts the child from public
school attendance. If this commentator had tried to make this
argument to a judge, he would have been booted unceremoniously out of
court. It simply doesn't hold water.

Because children are citizens, they enjoy many rights under the
Virginia and United States constitutions, including the right to
freedom of religion and freedom of association. However, until they
reach adulthood, their parents are the custodians of those rights.
The parent, not the child, determines how the child's rights will be
exercised, just as if it were a custodial bank account. If a child
wants to attend the church down the street, but his parents forbid
him, the issue is over. The parent gets to decide how the child's
right to worship will be exercised, not the child.

Likewise, the parent, not the child, gets to decide how the child's
right to an education will be exercised. If the parent wishes to
waive the child's right to a public school education, the parent has
the authority to do that. The religious exemption statute simply
implements one way a parent, on behalf of his child, can waive the
right to a public education. This does not violate the Virginia
Constitution; it honors it.

"The religious exemption statute needs to be changed because schools
have no idea how to implement it."

Local school boards have a significant amount of discretion in
deciding what procedures to adopt to implement the religious
exemption. It allows flexibility for school boards to try various
approaches and then adjust their policies based on the results.

A number of years ago, many school boards held full-fledged hearings--
almost like a trial-- any time anyone requested a religious exemption.
But as time went on, they realized that this was not a wise use of
resources. It was extremely rare for a parent to request a religious
exemption who did not actually deserve it, so conducting a hearing was
simply a waste of time and money.

Some school boards then simplified the process and simply called in
the parents for a question-and-answer session in front of the school
board. But school boards realized that this, too, was not a wise use
of their resources. So they simplified the process and instructed
their attorney to question the parents instead. But as time went on,
they realized this was also a waste of money.

Through trial and error, most school boards have adopted a policy
something like this: if the parents submit in writing a good-faith
explanation that public school attendance would violate their
religious convictions, and there is no reason to doubt their
sincerity, the school board grants the exemption. If the school board
has some reason to question the parent's sincerity, they may require
additional supporting information, or even require something like a
formal hearing.

This flexibility allows school boards to adjust to various
circumstances. Some school boards have adopted formal policies for
processing religious exemption requests; others have not. When
mistakes are made, they generally get corrected before a lot of time
and expense are invested. I speak from my experience in representing
families seeking the exemption during the past 14 years.

School boards implement a variety of procedural approaches to the
religious exemption, but this is a strength of the statute, not a
weakness.

A commentator suggested that school boards appear to routinely violate
the statute. The argument is based exclusively on the observation
that school systems use a wide variety of procedural approaches to
implementing the statute. The argument is false. When a statute gives
administrative discretion, evidence of a wide variety of
implementation practices is hardly proof that a school system is
violating the law.

"School boards almost never ask the children themselves what they
believe."

This is a correct observation, and also a correct implementation of
the statute. The statute does not require that a religious objection
be based exclusively on faith. It can be based on "training or
belief." If a parent has religious objections to public school
attendance, and he is training his child in the same beliefs, the
child is entitled to the religious exemption by virtue of his
training.

It is very important that the statute reads "training or belief"
rather than "training and belief." If the latter were the case, it
would be necessary, arguably, to question every single child about his
personal faith during the process. However, the Virginia legislature
has wisely avoided this awkward situation by allowing a child's
training to satisfy the law. It is therefore not necessary for school
boards to ask individual children what they believe so long as the
parents confirm that they are training the child's in the same beliefs
that they themselves hold.

The use of "or" rather than "and" is not a mere accident. Virginia's
religious exemption statute was drawn nearly verbatim from the federal
statute that allows conscientious objectors to be exempt from military
service. The federal statute used the phrase "training and belief."
The Virginia legislature intentionally switched to "or belief" when
adapting this language for Virginia's own exemption.

The commentator who criticized school boards for not interrogating
children about their faith failed to understand the significance of
the word "training" in the statute.

"School boards almost never deny exemption requests."

Having personally assisted literally hundreds of families obtain a
religious exemption, I can testify that it virtually never happens
that a family who doesn't deserve the exemption asks for it. School
boards almost never deny the request because folks who don't deserve
it almost never request it.

School boards are not afraid to deny the exemption in an appropriate
case. Our organization has represented several families whose
exemptions were denied.

Conclusion

Virginia has always been a leader in protecting religious freedom.
Our religious exemption statute is an example of our leadership in
this incredibly important area. It demonstrates that we highly value
the consciences of people of faith.

The empirical evidence indicates that parents provide an excellent
education to their children after receiving a religious exemption.
The statute gives school boards significant flexibility on procedural
issues so local conditions can be considered.

A child's right to an education is always in the hands of his parents.
It respects our constitutional values to allow parents to decide
whether child a should attend public school or obtain an exemption.

As we have already noted, the religious exemption statute has served
us well for 35 years. No changes are needed.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
-> How many acorns can a chipmunk hold in its cheeks?

We don't know! But we do know that gathering little by little
enables ordinary folks to prepare for hard times. That principle
is behind HSLDA's payment plan: by paying a month at a time,
families can receive an annual HSLDA membership. Meanwhile, they
can feel secure as they homeschool and focus on other priorities
-- their children. Don't go nuts trying to pay for membership all
at
once--choose our convenient payment plan.

More reasons to join HSLDA...
http://www.hslda.org/elink.asp?id=1937

----------------------------------------------------------------------
======================================================================
The HSLDA E-lert Service is a service of:

Home School Legal Defense Association
P.O. Box 3000
Purcellville, Virginia 20134
Phone: (540) 338-5600
Fax: (540) 338-2733
Email: info@hslda.org
Web: http://www.hslda.org

----------------------------------------------------------------------
How To Subscribe:

- Subscribe to the HSLDA E-lert Service at our website:

https://secure.hslda.org/hslda/elert/account.asp?Process=Subscribe

- Or send an email with name and complete mailing address to:

subscribe@hslda.org

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription Information:

- You subscribed to the HSLDA E-lert Service as:

##ToAddress##

- To unsubscribe from the HSLDA E-lert Service send an email from
the email address you want to unsubscribe to:

unsubscribe@hslda.org

- To change your email address or make other changes to your
subscription, visit the HSLDA E-lert Service account web page at:

https://secure.hslda.org/hslda/elert/account.asp

----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTMASTERS: This message is being sent to the most recent address we
have for our subscribers. If this is an invalid email address or you
have other problems, please reply to webmaster@hslda.org.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: This is considered a private and confidential message
from HSLDA to its bonafide HSLDA E-lert Service subscribers.
HSLDA cannot attest to the authenticity of copies posted, forwarded,
or sent by any party other than HSLDA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: Please do not reply or otherwise use this email address;
hslda@hslda.org is for broadcast purposes only and is not intended to
receive incoming messages. We cannot reply to any email sent to this
address. If you have comments or questions, please send email to
info@hslda.org or call HSLDA at 540-338-5600. HSLDA members can also
email staff directly through the Members website at
http://members.hslda.org/contact.asp. Thank you for your cooperation.
======================================================================