The Home School Court Report
VOLUME XV, NUMBER 3
- disclaimer -
MAY / JUNE 1999
Cover
Previous Issue  C  O  N  T  E  N  T  S  Next Issue


Cover Story
Does One Size Really Fit All?

Special Features
Hard Work and Prayer Make David Beihl the Best He Can Be

A New Strategy on RLPA

Strings Attached to Vouchers Weave an Entangling Web

National Center Reports
Ed Flex Act Passes Congress

Pending Matters: Your Call Counts

Light Within Congress

Weyrich Letter Makes Waves

Across the States
State by State

Regular Features
Press Clippings

Active Cases

Prayer and Praise

A Contrario Sensu

President’s Page

H  O  M  E     S  C  H  O  O  L  I  N  G     N  E  W  S     F  R  O  M
Across the States
AL · AR · AZ · CA · CO · CT · FL · IA · IL · IN · KS · LA · MA · ME · MI · ND · NJ · NM · NY · OH · OR · PA · RI · TN · TX · UT · VA · WA

Tidbits & Trivia

First in Unitied States automobile production.

Michigan

Dear Nonpublic School Operator
    A central Michigan family recently found themselves in an awkward position. After they withdrew their children from public school, they received a letter from the state department of education addressed to “Dear Nonpublic School Operator.” The letter suggested that they must fill out the enclosed Nonpublic School Membership Report form and return it to the department. The family mistakenly filled it out and returned it. When they received a follow-up letter asking for the qualifications of the teachers in the home school and what subjects they taught, they realized that something had gone amiss.
    Because the family had filled out and returned the Nonpublic School Membership Report form, the department of education had begun to treat them as a “nonpublic school.” Under Michigan law, nonpublic schools must file certain information with the local public school superintendent or intermediate superintendent at the beginning of each year. Additionally, the department of education is authorized to demand certain additional information including the courses of study and the qualifications of the teachers.
    Home School Legal Defense Association attorney Scott Woodruff wrote a letter to the department of education, informing them that the family did not wish to be treated as a nonpublic school and requesting that their names be removed from the list of nonpublic schools. The department of education honored this request and no longer expects the family to make annual filings or submit information concerning courses of study or teacher qualifications.
    Michigan Code section 380.1561(3) describes three ways a home school can operate: under subsection (a), under subsection (f), or under both (a) and (f). A home school operating under subsection (a) is considered a nonpublic school. A home school operating under subsection (f) is not. Many families prefer to be treated as a subsection (f) school so they are not obligated to send information to state or local officials. HSLDA members who have filed a Nonpublic School Membership Report form may contact our office for assistance in removing their name from the state’s nonpublic school list.