The Home School Court Report
Vol. XXVI
No. 2
Cover
March/April
2010

In This Issue

SPECIALFEATURES
REGULARCOLUMNS
ANDTHEREST

Legal / Legislative Updates Previous Page Next Page
- disclaimer -
Across the States
AL · CA · DE · FL· HI · IA · IL · IN · MI · NH · NJ · NY · OR · PA · RI · TX · VA · VT · WI · WV

NEW JERSEY

Cliffwood Lake Agrees to Revise Homeschool Policy

After homeschooling in Cliffwood Lake for three years, the Petermans (name changed to protect privacy) decided to give a courtesy notice to the superintendent.

He wrote back: “It is my responsibility to determine if the programs you are using are equivalent to those in our schools.” He continued, “I need to make this determination and seek your help in doing so … We would like to arrange a meeting, so we might explore this further.”

While the tone of the letter was courteous and friendly, the message was troubling. The superintendent was asserting that the school system had the authority to judge the contents of the family’s curriculum.

This is the type of conflict that motivated New Jersey homeschool leaders to meet with education officials in 2000 and revise the state department of education’s policy guidance on homeschooling. The result was a consensus document: the New Jersey Department of Education’s 2000 policy statement, “Frequently Asked Questions: Homeschooling.” It lined up so well with state law and court precedent that conflict in the Garden State fell by magnitudes.

Unfortunately, Cliffwood Lake never got the proverbial memo. Although the district revised its homeschool policy in 2003, it did not incorporate the state’s 2000 policy guidance. While the superintendent’s requests to the Petermans were consistent with Cliffwood Lake’s written policy, the policy itself was obsolete.

The Petermans, members of Home School Legal Defense Association since 1997, contacted us for help. HSLDA Senior Counsel Scott Woodruff called the superintendent and followed up with a letter detailing the problem and suggesting solutions. After conferring with the school system’s attorney, the superintendent agreed that the policy needed to be substantially revised to bring it up to date. And he dropped all his requests to the Petermans.

— by Scott A. Woodruff