Home School Legal Defense Association--25 Years of Serving the Homeschool Community




Quick Menu
Clicks 4 Homeschooling
Getting Started
In Your State
High School - SAT Offer
Early Years
Struggling Learners
International
Curriculum Market
Issues Library
Research
Speakers
Bookstore
Group Services
E-lert Service
About HSLDA
Joining HSLDA
Español
 
 HSLDA Members 
 
Members Site
Renew Online
Forms & Resources
Contact Your Staff

The Home School Court Report
Vol. XXIII
No. 1
Cover
January/February
2007

In This Issue

SPECIALFEATURES
REGULARCOLUMNS
ANDTHEREST

Legal / Legislative Updates Previous Page Next Page
- disclaimer -
Across the States
AL · AZ · CA· CO · CT · IL · IN · IA · KS · KY · MA · MI · MN · MO · NJ · NM · NY · NC · OH · OR · TN · TX · VA · WY ·

CONNECTICUT

District seeks curriculum review

After a Home School Legal Defense Association member family filed a notice of intent to conduct home instruction with East Lyme Public Schools, they received a letter from the school district instructing them to make an appointment “in order to review the curriculum [the family would] be providing.” Apparently this proposed curriculum review was an effort to determine whether these homeschooled children were receiving equivalent instruction in the studies taught in the public schools, as required by § 10-184 of Connecticut General Statutes.

HSLDA Senior Counsel Dewitt Black sent a letter to the superintendent of schools explaining that the family had decided to comply with the guidelines established by the Connecticut State Board of Education on November 7, 1990. According to the state department of education, parents who follow these guidelines are considered to meet the “equivalent instruction” requirement. Because of this, Black explained, there is no reason for any school district to review the curriculum of homeschoolers who are following the guidelines. After receiving HSLDA’s letter, the public school officials made no further effort to require the family to submit their curriculum for review.

The guidelines provide that there is to be a portfolio review at the end of the school year “to determine if instruction in the required courses has been given.” This is the limited purpose of the portfolio review. There is to be no evaluation of the student’s academic progress, no review of any standardized test results, no examination of attendance records, and no review of curricular materials.

HSLDA member families encountering similar difficulties with public school officials concerning their decision to follow the state guidelines should contact us for assistance.

— by Dewitt T. Black

Printer Friendly Version



© Site Copyright 1996-2010 Home School Legal Defense Association
P.O. Box 3000 · Purcellville, VA 20134-9000 · Phone: (540) 338-5600 · Fax: (540) 338-2733 · E-mail: info@hslda.org

HOME | SEARCH | FEEDBACK | PRIVACY POLICY | USER AGREEMENT | ADVERTISING

Supported by the
Home School Foundation
Home School Foundation
www.homeschoolfoundation.org