The Home School Court Report
Vol. XXII
No. 3
Cover
May/June
2006

In This Issue

SPECIALFEATURES
REGULARCOLUMNS
ANDTHEREST

Legal / Legislative Updates Previous Page Next Page
- disclaimer -
Across the States
AL · AK · AZ· CA · ID · IL · KS · KY · ME · MI · MN · MS · MO · NH · NJ · NM · NY · ND · OH · OR · PA · TN · TX · VT · VA · WV · WY

NORTH DAKOTA

School District Refuses to Provide Monitor

Halfway through the 2005-2006 school year, a Home School Legal Defense Association member family found themselves in a legal dilemma when the Velva Public School District 1 notified them that it would not provide a monitor required for their home education program.

Unless a homeschooling parent in North Dakota is a state-certified teacher, holds a baccalaureate degree, or has met the cutoff score of a national teacher examination, the parent must be monitored by a state-certified teacher for the first two years of homeschooling. According to state law, "the school district shall assign and compensate an individual to monitor a child receiving home education unless the parent notifies the school district that the parent shall select and compensate an individual to monitor the child."

In the case of our member family, the mother had initially selected a monitor who functioned in this capacity for a brief period of time, but who had notified the mother that she no longer desired to continue providing monitor services. At that point, the teaching parent chose to obtain monitoring services provided by the school district, but the school district refused to cooperate.

HSLDA Senior Counsel Dewitt Black wrote the superintendent of the school district and told him that the school district's refusal to furnish a monitor for our member family would waive the requirement that the home education program be monitored at all. Black explained that a school district may not refuse to provide a monitor as required by state law and then complain that the home education program is not monitored. After receiving this letter, the superintendent arranged for the school district to provide a monitor to the family at no cost.

— by Dewitt T. Black