Home School Legal Defense Association--25 Years of Serving the Homeschool Community




Quick Menu
Clicks 4 Homeschooling
Getting Started
In Your State
High School - SAT Offer
Struggling Learners
International
Curriculum Market
Issues Library
Research
Speakers
Bookstore
Group Services
E-lert Service
About HSLDA
Joining HSLDA
Español
 
 HSLDA Members 
 
Members Site
Renew Online
Forms & Resources
Contact Your Staff

The Home School Court Report
VOLUME XX, NUMBER 2
- disclaimer -
March / April 2004


FEATURES
State Legislation Summary—2003
Battleground New Jersey

Late-breaking news

Congress investigates

With the help of others
College sports: Game on For Homeschoolers

What is the NCAA?

Sports organizations
Generation Joshua vision

Election realities

Generation Joshua leadership

Getting involved
Eliminating anonymous tips

DEPARTMENTS
Freedom watch
From the heart

From the director:In the armsof amazing love

Impact of the HSF General Fund

Mission Statement of HSF
Across the states
Active cases
Members only
About campus

Elite education: Hope for our national crisis

SAT score comparisons
President's page

ET AL.

HSLDA social services contact policy/A plethora of forms

HSLDA legal inquiries

Prayer & Praise


 «
  LEGAL/LEGISLATIVE UPDATES  

» 


ACROSS THE STATES

AZ · AK · CA · CO · HI · IL · IN · MA · MI · MN · MO · NE · NY · NC · OH · PA · TN · VT

NEW YORK

Victory in Wappingers

Home School Legal Defense Association recently helped a member family in Wappingers Central School District when the superintendent wrote a letter stating that parents would no longer be able to administer the standardized achievement test to their own children for the annual assessment requirement. While Regulations of the Commissioner of Education § 100.10 gives the superintendent of the local school district authority to consent to the person chosen by the parent to administer a standardized achievement test, there is no prohibition against a parent administering the achievement test to his or her own child.

In this particular situation, there was no reasonable basis for the superintendent to withhold his consent since both parents had at least a bachelor's degree. Local homeschool leaders, longstanding HSLDA members, and HSLDA Attorney Thomas Schmidt worked together to convince the district that these parents were more than qualified to administer the test.

While § 100.10 does not require that parents have any particular qualifications to administer the standardized achievement test to their own children, the law does give the power of consent to the superintendent. Because of this statutory authority, HSLDA generally advises parents to indicate any qualifications they might have when stating the method of annual assessment (usually done in the third-quarter report). This provides the best information to the school district.

The ability of school district superintendents to determine—without objective guidelines—who administers achievement tests is one of the reasons HSLDA supports Assembly Bill 4598 and Senate Bill 2060, currently in the New York legislature. These bills would eliminate approximately 75% of the present restrictions on homeschoolers in New York, including the consent requirement.

— by Thomas J. Schmidt

Printer Friendly Version



© Site Copyright 1996-2008 Home School Legal Defense Association
P.O. Box 3000 · Purcellville, VA 20134-9000 · Phone: (540) 338-5600 · Fax: (540) 338-2733 · E-mail: info@hslda.org

HOME | SEARCH | FEEDBACK | PRIVACY POLICY | USER AGREEMENT | ADVERTISING

Supported by the
Home School Foundation
Home School Foundation
www.homeschoolfoundation.org