The Home School Court Report
VOLUME XVII, NUMBER 5
- disclaimer -
SEPTEMBER / OCTOBER 2001
Cover
Previous Issue  C  O  N  T  E  N  T  S  


Cover Story
Susan Oliver: Convicted—even though this mom did everything right

Special Features
Patrick Henry College doubles enrollment

Jordan's excellent adventure

Across the States
State by State

Regular Features
Active Cases

Freedom Watch

A contario sensu

Prayer and Praise

President's Page

FYI
HSLDA legal contacts for May and June 2001

H  O  M  E     S  C  H  O  O  L  I  N  G     N  E  W  S     F  R  O  M
Across the States
AR · CA · CO · CT · FL · GA · HI · IL · LA · ME · MO · MT · NC · NE · NJ · NY · OH · TN · TX · VA · WV
Ohio
Not so "Noble" School District

An alert Home School Legal Defense Association member family in the Noble Local School District contacted us after they discovered a major error in one of the forms the district was distributing.

Home schoolers in Ohio are required to submit an annual assessment to the superintendent. This assessment can either be a standardized test or a written narrative by either a third party or some other person mutually agreed upon.

The district's narrative option form seemed innocuous. Most of it appeared to quote directly from the regulations governing home schooling, and then there was a space for the assessor to sign.

However, in the section purporting to quote from the regulations, the school district added a phrase stating that the student's portfolio of work samples "is available for inspection." Ohio law has no such requirement.

HSLDA immediately contacted the school, demanding that the form be amended to conform to state law. The lawyers for the school district responded promptly, enclosing a new form that complied with the requirements of Ohio law.

HSLDA advises home schoolers to very be cautious about using any forms provided by the public school district, because creative expansions of regulatory authority unfortunately are not an isolated occurrence. — Darren A. Jones