Home School Legal Defense Association--25 Years of Serving the Homeschool Community




Quick Menu
Clicks 4 Homeschooling
Getting Started
In Your State
High School - SAT Offer
Early Years
Struggling Learners
International
Curriculum Market
Issues Library
Research
Speakers
Bookstore
Group Services
E-lert Service
About HSLDA
Joining HSLDA
Español
 
 HSLDA Members 
 
Members Site
Renew Online
Forms & Resources
Contact Your Staff

The Home School Court Report
VOLUME XVI, NUMBER 4
- disclaimer -
JULY / AUGUST 2000
Cover
Previous Issue  C  O  N  T  E  N  T  S  Next Issue


Cover Story
Average Families with Outstanding Courage

Special Features

Home Schoolers Making Headlines

HSLDA Debate Tournament: Final Round

National Center Reports

HSLDA Testifies on NAEP Reform

IRS Fines Families for Refusing SSNs

In Our Prayers: The Passing of Sen. Coverdell

Across the States

State by State

Regular Features

In the Trenches

Active Cases

Pending Cases

Staff News

Prayer and Praise

Presidents Page

F. Y. I.

The Widows Curriculum Scholarship Fund

H  O  M  E     S  C  H  O  O  L  I  N  G     N  E  W  S     F  R  O  M
Across the States
AL · CA · CO · CT · DC · GA · HI · IL · IN · MD · MS · MT · NC · NJ · NV · NY · OH · OR · SC · TN · VA · WI · WV · WY
West Virginia

Raleigh County Policy Falls Short

Some features of a new Raleigh County Schools policy venture beyond legal authority.

  • It requires parents operating under exemption B(a) to have a school day the same length as the public schools, which the law does not require.

  • It requires standardized testing for families operating under B(a). While West Virginia Code section 18-8-1.B(a) permits the county board to require the family to furnish “information and records” concerning the “attendance, instruction and progress of pupils,” it does not authorize the county to require that a standardized test be administered. The policy ought to be modified so as to allow additional alternatives for showing student progress.

  • It attempts to impose these same two requirements on those families who operate under exemption B(b) and use a “correspondence course.” If a family is in compliance with the other requirements for B(b), the law does not authorize additional requirements simply because the family uses a correspondence course. The policy does not define “correspondence course.”

    The Raleigh County Home School Coordinator has been receptive to the concerns of home school families in the past, and we hope that these issues will be resolved so that the rights of all home school families are protected. Our special thanks to John Carey of Christian Home Educators of West Virginia who has had several discussions with the home school coordinator on this subject.— Scott A. Woodruff

  • Printer Friendly Version



    © Site Copyright 1996-2010 Home School Legal Defense Association
    P.O. Box 3000 · Purcellville, VA 20134-9000 · Phone: (540) 338-5600 · Fax: (540) 338-2733 · E-mail: info@hslda.org

    HOME | SEARCH | FEEDBACK | PRIVACY POLICY | USER AGREEMENT | ADVERTISING

    Supported by the
    Home School Foundation
    Home School Foundation
    www.homeschoolfoundation.org