The Home School Court Report
VOLUME XVI, NUMBER 4
- disclaimer -
JULY / AUGUST 2000
Cover
Previous Issue  C  O  N  T  E  N  T  S  Next Issue


Cover Story
Average Families with Outstanding Courage

Special Features

Home Schoolers Making Headlines

HSLDA Debate Tournament: Final Round

National Center Reports

HSLDA Testifies on NAEP Reform

IRS Fines Families for Refusing SSNs

In Our Prayers: The Passing of Sen. Coverdell

Across the States

State by State

Regular Features

In the Trenches

Active Cases

Pending Cases

Staff News

Prayer and Praise

Presidents Page

F. Y. I.

The Widows Curriculum Scholarship Fund

H  O  M  E     S  C  H  O  O  L  I  N  G     N  E  W  S     F  R  O  M
Across the States
AL · CA · CO · CT · DC · GA · HI · IL · IN · MD · MS · MT · NC · NJ · NV · NY · OH · OR · SC · TN · VA · WI · WV · WY
Alabama

Voucher Bill Considered

During Alabama’s 2000 legislative session, an educational voucher bill was introduced but died in committee. This legislation was named the Student Opportunity Scholarship Program, also known as the SOS Program.

If passed, this voucher proposal would have permitted public school students in districts not meeting state academic standards to transfer to a public, private, parochial, church, or home school, or a private tutor. However, attending a “home school” is not one of the educational options for complying with the compulsory attendance law of Alabama. Parents teaching their children at home do so either by enrollment in a church school or through the services of a private tutor. A “home school” is nowhere defined in Alabama law. Accordingly, it was uncertain how this voucher bill would be applied to students being taught at home by their parents.

HSLDA has long opposed any type of voucher system whereby parents receive state money in the education of their children. State funding for education inevitably leads to state control of education, and loss of freedom is a high price parents must pay in receiving state funds to educate their children. Instead, HSLDA believes that parents should be able to keep more of their hard-earned money through income tax credits in order to have more money to spend for their children’s education. — Dewitt T. Black