The Home School Court Report
VOLUME XI, NUMBER 2
- disclaimer -
1995
Cover
Previous Issue  C  O  N  T  E  N  T  S  Next Issue



Cover Story
The Parental Rights Act: Establishing a Standard of Liberty

Special Features
Homeschoolers Help with 100 Days' Salute


Homeschoolers Plan Strategy

Features
National Center Reports

Litigation Report

Across the States

President’s Page

A C R O S S   T H E   S T A T E S

AK · AR · AZ · CA · CT · GA · HI · IN · KY · MA · MI · MN · MO · MS · ND · NH · NJ · NM · NY · PA · SC · SD · TN · TX · UT · VA · WA

MASSACHUSETTS

Home Schools in the Early Lead

Massachusetts home schoolers who want to play on the public school basketball courts are finding that they must first appear in the legal courts. Massachusetts attorney Robert Waldo, Esq., has filed a number of lawsuits challenging the Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Association (MIAA) for its practice of refusing to let home schoolers on public school sports teams. In a surprising opinion, Justice James Donohue of Worcester Superior Court ruled that he would uphold anything the MIAA did that was rationally related to a legitimate State interest—but found the MIAA practice of banning home schoolers from sports teams neither rational nor legitimate. (Davis v. MIAA, Civ. No. 94-2887, Worcester Superior Court, Jan. 18, 1995.) So far, the score is Home Schools 3, Public Schools 0!