HOME | LAWS | ORGANIZATIONS | CASES | LEGISLATION
SB 233 gradually raises the maximum age of compulsory school attendance from 16 to 18. The age is raised to 16½ on July 1, 2013, and then increased one-half year each year until it reaches 18 on July 1, 2016.
This bill would impose increased government control over children and further restrict parents’ rights to direct the upbringing and education of their children. These are rights that have been recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court as fundamental constitutional rights.
This bill would subject students (including homeschool students) to compulsory attendance laws for two more years. Many homeschool families graduate their children from homeschool programs to enroll them in college or apprenticeship programs. Today, parents have the authority to determine whether their children continue in formal secondary education after the age of 16—this right must be preserved.
01/03/2012 (Senate) Introduced and referred to Education Committee
03/20/2012 (Senate) Favorable report from the Committee on Education; Referred to the Committee on Appropriations
04/23/2012 (Senate) Read second time
04/24/2012 (Senate) Read third time and passed
04/26/2012 (House) Read first time and referred to the Committee on Education
1. Statistics have shown that raising the compulsory attendance age will not reduce the dropout rate. In fact, three out of the top five states with the highest high school completion rates, Iowa (86.6%), Vermont (86.5%), and North Dakota (86.3%), compel attendance only to age 16. The state with the lowest completion rate (Nevada: 55.8%) compels attendance to age 18. Further, the average dropout rate for states with compulsory attendance age of 16 is 23.4% while the rate for states with compulsory attendance age of 18 is 23.9%. (Figures are based on average freshman graduation rates: 2004-05 school year). View complete results here.
2. Older children unwilling to learn can cause classroom disruptions and even violence, making learning harder for their classmates who truly want to learn.
3. Passing this bill would restrict parents’ freedom to decide if their 16-year-old is ready for college or the workforce. (Some 16-year-olds benefit more from valuable work experience than from being forced to sit in a classroom).
4. Another significant impact of expanding the compulsory attendance age is an inevitable tax burden to pay for more classroom space and teachers to accommodate the additional students compelled to attend public schools. When California raised the age of compulsory attendance, unwilling students were so disruptive that new schools had to be built just to handle them and their behavior problems, all at the expense of the taxpayer.
5. A study by Cornell University on raising the age of compulsory attendance found that there was no correlation between passing a law to raise the age of compulsory attendance and high school completion rates. The study shows that specific programs targeting at risk youth can help improve completion rates, but a law raising the age of attendance does not. To view the report click here.
For more information, please see our Issues Library page on compulsory attendance age legislation.
| Other Resources|