Nevada
HOME | LAWS | ORGANIZATIONS | CASES | LEGISLATION | HEADLINES | COMMON CORE
Nevada

June 22, 2007

Senate Bill 312: Raises the Age of Compulsory Attendance to 18 Years

Author:
Senators Steven A. Horsford, Terry Care, Bernice Mathews, Michael A. Schneider, Valerie Wiener and Joyce Woodhouse

Summary:
Senate Bill 312 would increase the control of the state over your children for another year. This bill would raise the age of compulsory attendance in Nevada from 17 to 18 years of age.

Status:

3/19/2007(Senate) Referred to the Human Resources and Education
4/11/2007(Senate) Human Resources and Education voted to pass as amended
4/24/2007(Senate) Passed the full Senate 21-0
5/16/2007(House) Do Pass Assembly Education Committee
5/20/2007(House) Passed the House
6/1/2007Approved by the Governor, effective July 1, 2007

HSLDA's Position:
HSLDA is opposed to this bill.

Action Requested:
No action requested at this time.

Background:
Raising the compulsory attendance age will not reduce the dropout rate. In fact, the two states with the highest high school completion rates, Maryland at 94.5% and North Dakota at 94.7%, compel attendance only to age 16. The state with the lowest completion rate (Oregon: 75.4%) compels attendance to age 18. (Figures are three year averages, 1996 through 1998.)

Twenty-nine states only require attendance to age 16. Older children unwilling to learn can cause classroom disruptions and even violence, making learning harder for their classmates who truly want to learn.

It would restrict parents’ freedom to decide if their 16-year-old is ready for college or the workforce. (Some 16-year-olds who are not academically inclined benefit more from valuable work experience than from being forced to sit in a classroom.)

Another significant impact of expanding the compulsory attendance age would be an inevitable tax increase to pay for more classroom space and teachers to accommodate the additional students compelled to attend public schools. When California raised the upper age limit of compulsory attendance, unwilling students were so disruptive that new schools had to be built just to handle them and their behavior problems, all at the expense of the taxpayer.

For more information on compulsory attendance, please see our Issues Library page on compulsory attendance age legislation.

 Other Resources

May-22-2007—Nevada—Call to Stop the Expansion of State Control over Your Children

Bill Text   (requires Adobe Acrobat Reader)

Bill History