|
March 11, 2009
House Bill 4132: Raising the Age of Compulsory Attendance to 18 Years Author: Summary: Status:
HSLDA’s Position: Action Requested: “Please vote against H.B. 4132, which raises the age of compulsory school attendance. It only serves as a waste of taxpayers’ money—in a time of economic crisis, it would also force unwilling, disruptive students into the classroom and take away the right of parents to decide whether their 16-year-old is ready for valuable work experience or college.” You do not need to mention that you homeschool. If your last name begins with A–E, please call (or email) the representatives numbered 1–5; if it begins with F–J, call 6–10; if K–O, call 11–15; if P–S, 16–20; if T–Z, 21–22. House Education Committee: 1. Tim Melton (D-Pontiac), Chair 2. Lisa Brown (D-Bloomfield Hills), Vice Chair 3. Tim Bledsoe (D-Grosse Pointe) 4. Barb Byrum (D-Onondaga) 5. Marc Corriveau (D-Northville) 6. Doug Geiss (D-Taylor), Bill Sponsor 7. Jennifer Haase (D-Richmond) 8. Deb Kennedy (D-Brownstown) 9. Steve Lindberg (D-Marquette) 10. David Nathan (D-Detroit) 11. Gino Polidori (D-Dearborn) 12. Sarah Roberts (D-St. Clair Shores) 13. Joel Sheltrown (D-West Branch) 14. Mary Valentine (D-Norton Shores) 15. Phil Pavlov (R-St. Clair Township), Minority Vice Chair 16. Richard Ball (R-Laingsburg) 17. Larry DeShazor (R-Portage) 18. Tom McMillin (R-Rochester Hills) 19. Tom Pearce (R-Rockford) 20. Paul Scott (R-Grand Blanc) 21. Sharon Tyler (R-Niles) 22. John Walsh (R-Livonia) Background: Twenty-nine states only require school attendance to age 16. Older children unwilling to learn can cause classroom disruptions and even violence, making learning harder for their classmates who truly want to learn. It would restrict parents’ freedom to decide if their 16-year-old is ready for college or the workforce. (Some 16-year-olds who are not academically inclined benefit more from valuable work experience than from being forced to sit in a classroom. Another significant impact of expanding the compulsory attendance age would be an inevitable tax increase to pay for more classroom space and teachers to accommodate the additional students compelled to attend public schools. When California raised the age of compulsory attendance, unwilling students were so disruptive that new schools had to be built just to handle them and their behavior problems, all at the expense of the taxpayer. For more information on compulsory attendance, please see our issues library entry, Compulsory Attendance Age Legislation. |
|
© Site Copyright 1996-2009 Home School Legal Defense Association P.O. Box 3000 · Purcellville, VA 20134-9000 · Phone: (540) 338-5600 · Fax: (540) 338-2733 · E-mail: info@hslda.org HOME | SEARCH | FEEDBACK | PRIVACY POLICY | USER AGREEMENT | ADVERTISING Supported by the
|