|
January 14, 2008
House Bill 5594: Raising the Age of Compulsory Attendance to 18 Years Author: Summary: Status:
HSLDA’s Position: Action Requested: Background: Twenty-nine states only require attendance to age 16. Older children unwilling to learn can cause classroom disruptions and even violence, making learning harder for their classmates who truly want to learn. It would restrict parents’ freedom to decide if their 16-year-old is ready for college or the workforce. (Some 16-year-olds who are not academically inclined benefit more from valuable work experience than from being forced to sit in a classroom. Another significant impact of expanding the compulsory attendance age would be an inevitable tax increase to pay for more classroom space and teachers to accommodate the additional students compelled to attend public schools. When California raised the age of compulsory attendance, unwilling students were so disruptive that new schools had to be built just to handle them and their behavior problems, all at the expense of the taxpayer. For more information on compulsory attendance, please see our memorandum, “Raising the Compulsory Attendance Age Fails to Achieve Significant Results.”Bill Text (requires Adobe Acrobat Reader) |
|
© Site Copyright 1996-2009 Home School Legal Defense Association P.O. Box 3000 · Purcellville, VA 20134-9000 · Phone: (540) 338-5600 · Fax: (540) 338-2733 · E-mail: info@hslda.org HOME | SEARCH | FEEDBACK | PRIVACY POLICY | USER AGREEMENT | ADVERTISING Supported by the
|